Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal for GenAI Security fields #1335

Closed

Conversation

susan-shu-c
Copy link

Related to: #1034

Changes

Proposing the following fields that enable security detections to protect LLMs from attacks, misuse (violations, compliance etc.). For example these detection rules.

gen_ai.policy.name	
gen_ai.policy.action
gen_ai.policy.confidence
gen_ai.compliance.violation_detected
gen_ai.compliance.violation_code
gen_ai.performance.request_size

Merge requirement checklist

@susan-shu-c susan-shu-c requested review from a team August 14, 2024 14:30
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Aug 14, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: susan-shu-c / name: Susan (a673664)

@susan-shu-c
Copy link
Author

susan-shu-c commented Aug 14, 2024

Notes

Some notes from 08-14-2024 working group regarding this proposal:

@lmolkova lmolkova mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2024
3 tasks
@jsuereth
Copy link
Contributor

I think this may be related to #903 cc @trisch-me

@susan-shu-c
Copy link
Author

susan-shu-c commented Aug 19, 2024

Thanks, all! Now chatting with @trisch-me about what I can use from her PR #903, specifically some of those in security_rule

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 4, 2024

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 4, 2024
@susan-shu-c
Copy link
Author

susan-shu-c commented Sep 11, 2024

I'm going to close this for now -- makes more sense to use what's in #903
If needed, I will reopen or create a new branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants